The Larry Davis Case: How a 19-Year-Old Took On the NYPD and Exposed a City's Darkest Secret

In November 1986, a 19-year-old man named Larry Davis became the most wanted fugitive in New York City. He was accused of shooting six police officers who had come to arrest him at his sister’s apartment in the Bronx. He fled out a window, evaded a manhunt involving hundreds of officers, and after 17 days on the run, surrendered to authorities — but only after ensuring the media was watching.

What happened next would expose a web of police corruption, drug dealing, and institutional failure that stretched far beyond one apartment in the Bronx. It would also make Larry Davis a folk hero to some, a villain to others, and a symbol of everything wrong with the criminal justice system in the 1980s.

And at the center of it all was a question nobody in power wanted to answer: who was really protecting whom?

The Setup: Cops, Drugs, and a Young Man Trying to Get Out

To understand what happened in that apartment, you have to understand the world Larry Davis was operating in.

The 1980s crack epidemic hit American cities like a bomb. And in New York, the drug trade was not always separate from law enforcement. Officers were involved in bringing drugs into communities. Some were profiting. Some were protecting dealers. Some were both.

“The cops would bring the drugs into the community, people get hooked on crack, cocaine is disruptive to the family, and when it gets so disruptive people commit crimes. You’ve got prisons with a massive prison industrial complex that has come into being in the last 20 years to handle the incarceration of large numbers of black and Latino men. This is why I say it’s a metaphor for a gentle, subtle war against black people in America. They’ve used drugs as a pretext to just wipe out a generation of young black people.”

That’s how one observer described it in the documentary. And Larry Davis, according to multiple accounts, was caught up in exactly that machine.

He was a young man with musical ambitions. He played piano, organ, keyboard. He was in the studio, working on music, trying to build something legitimate. But he also had connections to the streets — connections that, he later claimed, were tied to corrupt police officers.

“I knew this should be much more serious than some regular hustling. These [cops] was hitting them with mountains, telling them bring us something back.”

Larry, according to his own account and the accounts of people close to him, worked as a drug enforcer for a group of rogue cops. He would collect money. He would handle problems. And for a while, it worked. But then he wanted out.

“When I lost my son… I found out that homeboy told all of the police. This is somebody now I was doing business with. They killed my son. That was the turning point. I said, that’s it, I’m out this game.”

The problem with quitting, though, is that the people you’re quitting on don’t always let you leave. Especially when you know too much.

The Raid

On November 19, 1986, a team of officers assembled outside a Bronx tenement. They believed Larry Davis was hiding in his sister’s apartment. They wanted him for questioning in the murders of four reputed drug dealers.

What happened next is still disputed. What is known is that as the officers entered, shots were fired. When it was over, six officers had been wounded. Larry Davis was gone — out a window, over a wall, into the night.

“I fired one, hit him with impact into the mouth and then coming out the back of his neck. Then there were many of the other cops behind him with weapons. They dropped seven weapons on the floor and they fled.”

According to Larry, the first officer through the door fired a shotgun at him from close range. The shot creased his head and took him down. He fired back. The officers retreated. He escaped.

The police version was different. They said he ambushed them. They said he was a violent criminal who would kill for no reason. They called him a walking arsenal.

The Manhunt

The search for Larry Davis became one of the largest manhunts in New York State history.

“The New York City Police Department would take on one of the largest manhunts in the history of New York State. The whole city is looking for Larry Davis.”

For 17 days, he evaded capture. He moved between apartments, changed his appearance, relied on a network of people who — for reasons of fear, loyalty, or both — helped him stay free.

One of the most remarkable moments came when a female officer, appearing on television, made a public statement that shocked even her colleagues: “If you talk about killing people’s families… that’s not the way these fools be talking.”

She was referring to the attitude of some officers involved in the search. It was a crack in the blue wall, and it hinted at the deeper story: the police were not just looking for a suspect. Some of them, according to Larry and his supporters, wanted him dead because he knew about their involvement in the drug trade.

atOptions = { 'key' : '6c8a8f68ada2f28e7ab5c04a250a2763', 'format' : 'iframe', 'height' : 60, 'width' : 468, 'params' : {} }; ref="#the-surrender" aria-hidden="true" class="anchor" id="the-surrender">The Surrender

After 17 days, Larry Davis surrendered. But he did it on his own terms. He contacted the media, arranged to be filmed, and walked out with his hands up — ensuring that the world would see him alive and in police custody.

“He actually engineered it to render in the full light of the press. He knew the media was there. What would happen is that the police would not be able to fend to England so we were very surprised and certainly very pleased to find out that he had survived his ordeal with the police.”

He knew that if the police had caught him in private, he might not have survived. By making his surrender public, he protected himself.

The Trial

What followed was one of the most extraordinary trials in New York legal history. Larry Davis faced multiple charges: the murder of four drug dealers, the attempted murder of six police officers, a shooting in Upper Manhattan, and a kidnapping charge from his time on the run.

The prosecution tried the cases in order of what they thought they could win. The cop shooting was their strongest.

The defense, led by William Kunstler and Lynne Stewart, argued that Davis had acted in self-defense. They put forward a theory that the first officer through the door had fired a shotgun at point-blank range, and that Larry had returned fire only after being attacked.

The key evidence was a bullet trajectory. A 12-gauge shotgun slug had creased Larry’s head, gone through a drawer in the back apartment, and left two holes. Forensic analysis showed that the shot had been fired from close range — not from down the hall, but from just a few feet away.

“If that gun had been fired from so many feet back, it would have to be fired in the air following the trajectory of the bullet. She walked it down to a place where it had to be held in a man’s hand. And he says, this is where he was when he fired it. He was down the hallway in the bedroom. And it was a short shot because Larry wasn’t more than four or five feet from him. And he fired, and it creased Larry’s head and took him down.”

The prosecution’s case relied on the testimony of officers who claimed they had no shotguns and that Larry had ambushed them. But the forensic evidence told a different story.

The Verdict

On the cop shooting charges, the jury acquitted Larry Davis of all counts. Sixteen times, the foreman said the words “not guilty.”

The verdict was a stunning legal upset. Prosecutors had called more than four dozen witnesses. The defense had argued it was a police frame-up. And the jury believed them.

“They had enough cases and enough time. They were determined to put him away. And if they hadn’t succeeded on the one, they succeeded on the next one, or the one after that, or the one after that. There was no way on earth that this system was going to let him go.”

He was not released. He was convicted on weapons charges and sentenced to five to fifteen years. Then he faced the other cases — the murder charges, the kidnapping charge. The system would keep him behind bars for as long as it could.

The Deeper Story

What emerged during the trials and in the years that followed was a picture of a city where police corruption was not an exception but a feature. Where officers were involved in drug dealing. Where evidence was suppressed. Where witnesses were intimidated. And where a young black man who fought back was treated not as a defendant but as an enemy of the state.

“The mainstream white press in this city… is very much involved with what police will say and what those papers will write about what police say. They don’t tell the whole truth. They don’t tell what people need to know so they can make intelligent and informed decisions about a particular case.”

The media coverage of Larry Davis was, by many accounts, biased and sensationalist. He was portrayed as a monster, a cop-killer, a fugitive. But as the trial revealed, the story was far more complicated.

The Legacy

Larry Davis was eventually convicted on other charges and spent decades in prison. But his case remains a landmark — not because of his guilt or innocence, but because of what it revealed about the system that pursued him.

It revealed that police corruption was real. That rogue officers were protected by the blue wall. That drugs were used as a weapon against communities of color. And that a young man with no power, no money, and no connections could still — for a brief moment — force the world to look at what was happening.

“I am the master of my fate. I am the captain of my soul.”

He said those words in an interview years later. They’re from a poem by William Ernest Henley — Invictus. And they capture something essential about the Larry Davis story: even in prison, even in defeat, he refused to be broken.

The system tried to destroy him. It failed.

And in failing, it exposed itself.